In an article I wrote about Pine Hill back in September, I mentioned a line from Ringo Starr, the famous Beatle. He said and I quote, “If you are over the age of 30 and just starting in rock music, you probably won’t make it.” Since that quote came from a very famous, seasoned musician it is sad but many rising stars believe this and don’t follow their passion. So I am here to ask, does age matter in rock?
When you look at all different kinds of music genres, I can see that this statement could apply in some and not in others. If you look at pop music or better known as “popular music,” you will see that this genre usually attracts a younger crowd. The more notable names of pop music would be: Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, The Jonas Brothers, N’Sync, Backstreet Boys, and other such phenoms. The younger generation flocks to them not just because of their voices, but because of their “hotness.”
Pop music focuses on looks more than anything else. This kind of music is all about sex and how sex sells. Britney Spears is an example to this. She got out on stage in a bikini and danced with a snake. Now tell me, do the youth want to see a 40 year old man or woman do that? No, that is unappealing to the kids of today. So, in the light of pop music, I would say that age does matter because it is more of a fad than anything else. Just ask groups like N’Sync and The Backstreet Boys who grew up. Their sex appeal became less pronounced with the teens and tweens of today. In turn, this led to them breaking up and trying more adult contemporary music.
Rock, R & B, Jazz and other similar kinds of music, I don’t see age to have a major influence. Rock is just that, rock music. People go out to head bang, thrash and crunk. They aren’t there to see how sexy the lead singer is, or the rest of the band. They just want to rock out. Probably that is why Mic Jagger, Ringo Starr, Metallica and all those names keep on rocking. Similarly, that is why the rock bands from the 60s through the 80s are still touring, while the pop artists are trying to redefine themselves.
R&B, Jazz, Soul and music of this kind of genre tend to have a more adult sound to it anyway. Adults realize that it’s about the music, but do take into consideration the sex factor. The sex factor does not determine if they will buy the artist’s CD, the music does.
Sure, if you are a star, everyone will compare you. People will fall for you and think you are sexy as it comes with the game. The impact it has on your career falls upon the genre you play and if you are not in pop music, then I feel that you really have nothing to worry about. I feel that Ringo’s words fall harsh and unnecessary because it shouldn’t be about the looks of the singer, but the music they produce. Age, however, may play a part on a musician’s endorsements such as underwear ads, but that doesn’t mean someone won’t pick them up to endorse something else.
My advice is to be who you are, show your talent and don’t worry about what people think about your looks. It’s your music they came to listen to, so don’t let your looks or your age stop you from your talents. If you love yourself, the fans will see this and love your music. It’s that simple, and that same advice can be applied to anything you do.





There are good statements in this article, yet I am still not convinced that age doesn’t matter when it comes to rock. I believe that Huey Lewis is the only person that made it while in his late 30s, early 40s. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but he is the excepetion to the rule. Therefore, there is a rule.
Being a wannabe with over 40 years under my belt, I find it hard to believe that there is hope for me or people my age. Someone please prove me wrong… I’ve been trying, but I guess I’m not the one to do it. Again though, if one or 2 exceptions surface, does it prove the rule?
Thanks for the article…
Rich
The Cranes
http://www.myspace.com/thecranesrock
I just happened to read your article, when googling and browsing about this topic.
I just want to say that I am really thankful that I’ve found your writing (accidentally!), because it really has erased a LOT of my endless-doubts about whether it is “too late” already for me to start the band career at age of 26 (which is where I’m currently at) !
It makes me believe so much in that many people would love to hear good/great MUSIC, as compared to only “looks” or “age appearance”.
thank you for this!
-Niki-
singer/songwriter from jakarta, Indonesia
I’m glad you wrote this article. It is definitely an encourage to me. I am 31, and my dream of becoming an R&B singer hasn’t died yet. Also, to Rich, Cheryl Crow also made it after age 30, but of course, she was around 32 or 33 when she became well known. Hope this helps.
My dream has not died yet, the devil will tell you anything to stop what God has plan for you. It’s all lies, dont stop doing you before you really don’t have a chance (FOR REAL). I’m 27 yrs old, and my life just begining, nothing like age will stop me. If anything it’s a blessing to have learn as much as I have in my 27 yrs on this earth. To all of you who read this, DON”T STOP! And soon you will see MaggzDaRichez, you better believe it!!!
GOOD FOR YOU!
I too have been wandering / wondering around this subject. Artists’ best work tends to be done by age 40, or that used to be the case for whatever reasons. Whereas my parents largely put down that ‘trivial’ part of their lives when they had children and left it behind them, recent generations seem to have kept up more – music has more resonance and meaning in our lives. Why? I can’t seem to quite accept that at age 46 I should be starting to make music, more ‘adult’ concerns should be taking up my time. This is a bit rambling, hope it makes sense.